Recently I worked in my lab for the first time in a long while. I found my lost car key on one of the benches. The same key that my husband replaced for me in honor
of our 15th wedding anniversary.
15
years ago I was eager and impatient to run my own laboratory. I had worked in others' laboratories
since undergraduate days, and believed I could do it better. I learned to “play” in a lab early from my
biomedical engineer father who would leave me alone for hours with microscopes,
circuit boards, power supplies, oscilliscopes, an old EKG machine &
treadmill, and other delights to take apart and put back together.
During my early years of setting up my own lab, my PhD
advisor would regale me with his vision of centralized labs—“playgrounds” for
scientists, staffed with technicians and other scientists. At the time I had
too much invested in my own vision of my own lab and what I wanted to
accomplish that I was unable to truly listen to his idea.
But now I would love to be able to do I want what (um….I
mean have my students do what they want) in an externally managed laboratory
playground environment, with technical support.
In fact, we do many of our experiments at synchrotron
beamlines, which are shared community resources to perform experiments that
many of us in the field have in common. It is far more efficient to have
staffed, group facilities to perform these experiments. However, beamtime is
expensive, and the requirement for user-friendliness often implies that
experiments be engineered for existing capabilities, rather than the other way
around. So these shared facilities are not quite the “playground” that my PhD
advisor envisioned.
It is a false dichotomy to ask “centralized facilities? vs. individual
labs?” What I’d like best is unlimited access to a combination of
(1) user facilities specialized for specific experiments (e.g. microscopes,
beamlines), (2) my own laboratory in which students, post-docs and I have free
reign to try new things and make mistakes and develop new experimental techniques
to address our questions. The problem is (1) is usually too specialized and
inflexible and therefore not the place for innovation and (2) often operates on a shoestring, necessarily limited, and
can be isolating and lonely.
Enter the mythological Laboratory Eden: well-managed,
staffed with knowledgeable helpful people, equipment-rich, scientist-playground where people come, work, build, talk,
laugh, share their ideas with each other, listen, learn, and love (science).
No comments:
Post a Comment