Recently, I was an invited participant to a prestigious scientific
convention for the brightest shining early-career stars. I was
flattered of course. It is fun to meet
with scientists from every discipline, and hear interesting talks, and meet new
people. I like conferences, and am always on the lookout for good science and kindred spirits.
The registration form contained the usual spaces for poster
title, research abstract, brief biography, and birthdate. With year. This last
bit I left blank.
The conference organizers—smart people—would easily see that one of the reasons I’m such an exemplary early career person—all those
accomplishments!—is because I’ve been “early career” for (-ahem-) 15 to
20 years, depending on how you count. And at either bound, it was not an early
start.
I'm afraid I'd be kicked out. Or perhaps added to the panel tasked with discussing "Old-Fart Science."
If you normalize my accomplishments to my years-at-it, I am not at
all exemplary, but simply a working scientist who divides her time among
research, teaching, service, family, friendships, occasional recreation, and
sleeping and eating.
Why am I perceived as early career when I am actually much
closer to menopause?
Here are my top 3 ideas:
1. I’m
short, but not without gravitas. Excuse me. Gravity.
2. I
use the word “awesome” liberally when talking about science that I think is
awesome.
3. Perhaps
it’s the pink glitter I use in my hair.
No comments:
Post a Comment